Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3591 14
Original file (NR3591 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
OF THE wavy

HUARD FUR CORRECTIUIN Urinmyne! ALCOR OS

ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490

DIC
Docket No. NR3591-14
G$ Oct 14
From: Chairman. Roard for Correction of Nawal Records
To: Secretary of the Navy
Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. LSS2

Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
(2) NPC memo 1160 Ser 913/163 dtd 31 Jul 14
(3) Subject's naval record

le Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter
referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board
requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected
to show the Petitioner reenlisted and eligible for advancement under
the provisions of the Selective Training and Reenlistment (STAR)
program.

2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Bey, Mr. Genteman, and Ms. Polk,
reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on
8 October 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined th
corrective action indicated below should be taken on the avail

a
considered by the Board

   

7+ aT _— fe a ceed
evidence of recora.
eS

3. The Board, having reviewed all the I
Petitioner's allegations of error and inj

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations
within the Department of the Navy.

b. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office
having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner’s
application has commented to the effect that the request has merit and
warrants favorable action.

CONCLUSION

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds

the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective
action.
Docket Wo. NK5591-14

RECOMMENDATION :

That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to
show that:

a. The Immediate Reenlistment Contract (NAVPERS 1070/601).
executed on or about 22 July 2013, 15 modiriea to read “Career
designated under MILPERSMAN 1160-100”. Note: all other remarks remain
the same.

b. Note: this change will entitle the Petitioner to be advanced
to Petty Officer Second Class upon completion of NEC 8467 sc" school.
Furthermore, if the Petitioner doesn’t pass, he may attend any school
listed on current Career School Listing (CSL) and still be eligible
for STAR.

 

c. A copy of this Report of Proceedings will be filed in
Petitioner's naval record.

4. It is certified that quorum was present at the Board's review and
deliberations, and that the foregoing is_-a,true and complete record of
the Board’s proceedings in the above Cit

  
  

5 Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6 (é)
of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records
(32 Code of Federal Regulations, Gection 723.6(e)) and having assured
compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the

seeeth

Eoregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference
(a), has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the
Navy.

9 Oct 14

ROBERT J. O'NEILL
Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3622 14

    Original file (NR3622 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be correc to show the Petitioner reenlisted and eligible for advancement un the provisions of the Selective Training and Reenlistment (STAR) program. 2, The Board, consisting of Mr. Bey, Mr. Genteman, and Ms. Polk, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 8 October 2014 and, pursuant to its...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5396 14

    Original file (NR5396 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY - BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 pic Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure {1} with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the Petitioner reenlisted and is eligible for advancement under the provisions of the Selective Training and Reenlistment (STAR) program. The Board,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1537 14

    Original file (NR1537 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure {1) with this Board requesting, 12 effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the Petitioner reenlisted and eligible for advancement under the provisions of the Selective Training and Reenlistment (STAR) program. CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1369 14

    Original file (NR1369 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that ‘the applicable naval record be corrected to modify an immediate reenlistment contract, and Petitioner eligible for advancement under the provisions of the Selective Training and Reenlistment (STAR) program. The Board, consisting of Mr: Zsalman, Mr. George, and Mr. Ruskin, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on .18...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 00638-11

    Original file (00638-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 DIC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the Petitioner reenlisted under the provisions of the Selective Training and Reenlistment (STAR) program. The 6 year reenlistment executed on or about 15 November 2010 is null...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06745-08

    Original file (06745-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 DIC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the Petitioner reenlisted and was advanced under the provisions of the Selective Training and Reenlistment (STAR) program. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. George...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2008-13

    Original file (NR2008-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a} Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the Petitioner reenlisted and eligible for advancement under the provisions of the Selective Training and Reenlistment (STAR} program. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and Mx. NR2008-13 RECOMMENDATION: That Petitioner's naval record be corrected, where appropriate,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2952 14

    Original file (NR2952 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinaiter yeferred to as Petitioner, Filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the Petitioner reenlisted and eligible for advancement under the provisions of the Selective Training and Reenlistment (STAR) 2, The Board, consisting of Mr. Ruskin, Mr. Exnicios, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice. CONCLUSION Upon review and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08715-07

    Original file (08715-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.Sincerely,W. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by the Board for correction of Naval Records...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00193-99

    Original file (00193-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. - Petitioner requests the reenlistment contract of 20 Mar 1998 reflect a STAR reenlistment and the automatic advancement benefit under the STAR program for the AN/BQQ-SE Advanced Maintenance and Operations Training at NAVSUBSCOL, Groton, CT. (l), the STS rating had no schools on the CSL at - Per enclosure However, in reference (b)...